Return-path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews10.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.15]:55260 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews10.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755186Ab3CMKEF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:04:05 -0400 Message-ID: <1363169039.3137.186.camel@x61.thuisdomein> (sfid-20130313_110409_418081_4BF045CE) Subject: Re: rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X From: Paul Bolle To: Jonas Gorski Cc: Ivo van Doorn , Gertjan van Wingerde , Helmut Schaa , "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Crispin Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:03:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1363165170.3137.182.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 10:51 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: > On 13 March 2013 09:59, Paul Bolle wrote: > > 3) What is the current status of the (out of tree) code that adds > > RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X? > > They are now present in 3.9-rc1, see a0b0197c (more specifically > 85639910..d3d2b420) :) Great. > The actual accepted Kconfig symbol names are different though, so they > should be changed in rt2x00 to match them (SOC_RT288X and SOC_RT305X). Thanks. Note that I could not find an actual Kconfig symbol SOC_RT288X! Anyhow, I guess somebody has the (trivial) patch to convert RALINK_RT...X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT...X to their SOC_* equivalents queued for inclusion in v3.9-rcX. Is that correct? Paul Bolle