Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:42294 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758488Ab3CDPyA (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:54:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1362412431.21028.38.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130304_165406_639169_D18BBEAF) Subject: Re: Linux summit this year ? From: Johannes Berg To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Larry Finger , Marcel Holtmann , Matt Chen , joeyli , linux-wireless Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:53:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130225211207.GE6455@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20130225_221525_165018_E30D3F09) References: <20130225143201.GA6455@tuxdriver.com> <1361809785.3902.19.camel@aeonflux> <512BAED0.2000507@lwfinger.net> <20130225211207.GE6455@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20130225_221525_165018_E30D3F09) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 16:12 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > I would still like to do New Orleans. I'm just not sure if we can > fit it in. I don't suppose that someone would like to propose it as > a mini-conference for LPC? Do we know what we want to discuss? I think there's a large topic of discussion around multi-channel management, i.e. how in particular wpa_supplicant should behave. We have the low-level feature implemented, but no real strategy for its use across the stack. We have some thoughts, use-cases etc. so this will probably have to be done before the summit though. johannes