Message-ID: <1362473477.23194.209.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> (sfid-20130305_095301_586119_3186C7AA)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] wl1251: call pm_runtime_put_sync in
 pm_runtime_get_sync failed case
From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
To: Li Fei <fei.li@intel.com>
CC: <linville@tuxdriver.com>, <wfp5p@virginia.edu>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <notasas@gmail.com>, <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:51:17 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1362037892.6212.13.camel@fli24-HP-Compaq-8100-Elite-CMT-PC>
References: <1362037031.6212.3.camel@fli24-HP-Compaq-8100-Elite-CMT-PC>
	 <1362037455.6212.8.camel@fli24-HP-Compaq-8100-Elite-CMT-PC>
	 <1362037892.6212.13.camel@fli24-HP-Compaq-8100-Elite-CMT-PC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 15:51 +0800, Li Fei wrote:
> Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
> is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
> value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
> pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
> 
> Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Fei <fei.li@intel.com>
> ---

Applied, thanks!

-- 
Luca.