Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]:54330 "EHLO sabertooth01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753522Ab3CHH1H convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Mar 2013 02:27:07 -0500 Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ath6kl-devel@qca.qualcomm.com" From: Kalle Valo To: =?utf-8?Q?Ale=C5=A1?= Voda Subject: Re: AR6103G Linux kernel 3.4.5 problems References: <62813611608FC749AC8F3F91AEAF5F89417512DD@CPEXM03.corp.dsg.local> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:27:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <62813611608FC749AC8F3F91AEAF5F89417512DD@CPEXM03.corp.dsg.local> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Ale=C5=A1?= Voda"'s message of "Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:35:34 +0000") Message-ID: <87ppzas663.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20130308_082711_997426_CDF74EF9) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Aleš Voda writes: > We have some custom board equipped with AR6103G using SDIO as hif and > are having problems with AR6103 not starting after downloading the > firmware. Linux kernel being used is 3.4.5. As it is apparent from the > console output attached, the fw related files are downloaded and a > timeout occurs after uploading data patch file to the chip. After > removing ath6kl_sdio driver and renaming fw-2 and fw-3 Why do you need to rename the firmware files? What version of ath6kl are you using? Where did you get it? > are so they can not be found and loaded, timeout during fw uploads > doesn't occur anymore after insertion of the ath6kl_sdio module, but > there is a HW startup failure while awaiting CTRL message from the > chip (err = -EIO). The firmware for the chip has been downloaded from > the kernel firmware git repository. > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git;a=tree;f= > ath6k/AR6003/hw2.1.1;hb=HEAD You should be using fw-3.bin. Better to remove athwlan.bin and fw-2.bin altogether from your platform. > What could be the problem? If you need any additional info please do > not hesitate to contact me. I think I don't have AR6103 myself. I'm not sure if it has some differences compared to AR6003, that's one possibility as well. -- Kalle Valo