Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:36310 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751823Ab3C0Ui7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:38:59 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hr17so2709467wib.11 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:38:58 -0700 (PDT) References: <1363808915-14278-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <3D4497AD-8992-47D6-BCF2-5D738B6AC9B4@gmail.com> <514AB846.9090407@openwrt.org> <20130327171713.GD1868@tuxdriver.com> <515339AB.30609@openwrt.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <515339AB.30609@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: (sfid-20130327_213905_323434_1AFE315C) Cc: "John W. Linville" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" From: Gertjan van Wingerde Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: make the driver build for Ralink SoC Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:38:54 +0100 To: John Crispin Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sent from my iPad On 27 mrt. 2013, at 19:25, John Crispin wrote: > On 27/03/13 18:17, John W. Linville wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 08:35:34AM +0100, John Crispin wrote: >>>>> Fix up the dependencies to make the driver actually compile on Ralink WiSoC. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: John Crispin >>>> I don't think this is a proper way to handle this. rt2x00pci.c was only meant to be used for PCI devices; introducing the use of CONFIG_PCI in that file doesn't seem appropriate to me. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately I am away from my home computer, so I can't look at this properly until the weekend. >>>> >>> Indeed not the cleanest patch ... after changing the config symbols >>> I realized that that is not enough to make the driver actually work >>> >>> It turns out that inside openwrt the compat-wireless package sets >>> CONFIG_RT2800PCI=m to make the driver build and then applies the >>> #ifdef'ery to rt2880pci.c >>> >>> I will try to find the time today or tomorrow to have a closer look at this >> Any more word on this? > Gabor posted a series as RFC that would fix this properly -> > > http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/pipermail/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/2013-March/005837.html Yeah, and that series looks good. Unfortunately, it is too intrusive to still apply for 3.9. John L., could we get in a scheme where we apply John C.'s patch for 3.9 and then use Gabor's series for 3.10? Don't know how that works with making sure that this patch is reverted for 3.10. Can you coordinate, or should I help you with this? --- Gertjan