Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:40445 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753994Ab3C0UNc (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:13:32 -0400 Message-ID: <1364415196.8388.26.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130327_211336_495611_8268A50A) Subject: Re: iwlwifi unable to reconnect after suspend since v3.9-rc1 From: Johannes Berg To: Alex Romosan Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ilw@linux.intel.com Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:13:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k3oszk2g.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> References: <87li993mug.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> <1364390086.8388.7.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <87r4j021ac.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> <1364406085.8388.11.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <87ip4cg1qg.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> <1364410962.8388.19.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <87txnwacdw.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> <1364411696.8388.21.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <871ub0zlgp.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> <1364413484.8388.23.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <87k3oszk2g.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 13:03 -0700, Alex Romosan wrote: > > Could you try this patch? > > > > http://p.sipsolutions.net/617a8667db243e11.txt > > with this patch applied i can take the network down and bring it back > again. this is the log: > [ 84.440148] wlan0: send auth to xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx (try 1/3) > [ 84.442819] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwl_trans_pcie_reclaim [Q 0] 0 -> 1 (1) > [ 84.442844] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx TXQ 0 status PASSIVE_NO_RX (0x00000090) rate_n_flags 0x800d retries 0 > [ 84.442855] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx FrameCnt = 1, idx=0 > [ 84.442884] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx TXQ 0 status PASSIVE_NO_RX (0x00000090) > [ 84.442896] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx initial_rate 0x800d retries 0, idx=0 ssn=1 seq_ctl=0x90 > [ 84.532849] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwl_trans_pcie_reclaim [Q 0] 1 -> 2 (2) > [ 84.532867] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx TXQ 0 status SUCCESS (0x00000201) > [ 84.532875] iwlwifi 0000:03:00.0: I iwlagn_rx_reply_tx initial_rate 0x400d retries 0, idx=1 ssn=2 seq_ctl=0x0 Ah so it's even the same packet because we set IEEE80211_TX_STAT_TX_FILTERED. Note the delay here -- roughly between 84.4428 and 84.5328 we wait for a beacon. I'll apply the patch and add your tested-by, like this: http://p.sipsolutions.net/7e871bfb5a0b272a.txt OK? johannes