Return-path: Received: from hub022-ca-4.exch022.serverdata.net ([64.78.56.56]:59731 "EHLO HUB022-ca-4.exch022.serverdata.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755554Ab3DJJzj (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:55:39 -0400 Message-ID: <51653716.1080804@posedge.com> (sfid-20130410_115543_264077_03B41B83) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:25:34 +0530 From: Vivekananda Holla MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: linux-wireless Subject: Re: [Patch] mac80211: SMPS for AP Mode References: <516528C8.90509@posedge.com> (sfid-20130410_105443_117821_9F07C071) <1365584151.8388.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5165326C.7010706@posedge.com> <1365587182.8388.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130410_114635_305806_9CD71018) <1365587230.8388.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1365587230.8388.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: hi Johannes, thanks for the clarification. I will update the patch and send it again. thanks and regards Vivek On 04/10/2013 03:17 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 11:46 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 15:05 +0530, Vivekananda Holla wrote: >>> hi Johannes, >>> >>> do you mean the IEEE80211_TX_RC_USE_RTS_CTS flag to set RTS/CTS >>> protection for the packet? >>> >>> I did not use this based on the below understanding >>> >>> my understanding for SMPS is that a station system does not need to >>> send an RTS packet before frame transmission for SMPS however an AP >>> system needs to send out an RTS frame. >> No? Where did you get that idea? It's wrong, it doesn't matter whether >> it's AP or not. > Of course, APs will rarely use SMPS, so stations almost never have to > deal with an AP that uses it ... > > johannes > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html