Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:49872 "EHLO mail-wg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932926Ab3DILZK (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 07:25:10 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m15so6677167wgh.15 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:25:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:21:20 +0200 From: Karl Beldan To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless , Karl Beldan Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: always pick a basic rate to tx RTS/CTS for pre-HT rates Message-ID: <20130409112120.GC27875@magnum.frso.rivierawaves.com> (sfid-20130409_132518_736625_8E43E88F) References: <1365156384-6699-1-git-send-email-karl.beldan@gmail.com> <1365503356.8465.37.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20130409105535.GA27875@magnum.frso.rivierawaves.com> <1365505512.8465.40.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20130409111028.GB27875@magnum.frso.rivierawaves.com> <1365506215.8465.41.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <1365506215.8465.41.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:16:55PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 13:10 +0200, Karl Beldan wrote: > > > > Oh, oops, confused. But then you look at 9.7.6.2 "Rate selection for > > > control frames that initiate a TXOP", which just mandates that you use > > > any rate that the receiver supports, so why bother doing basic rates > > > etc. at all? > > > > > > > This chapter precisely, however it reads: > > { > > "If a control frame other than a Basic BlockAckReq or Basic BlockAck is > > carried in a non-HT PPDU, the transmitting STA shall transmit the frame > > using one of the rates in the BSSBasicRateSet parameter or a rate from > > the mandatory rate set of the attached PHY if the BSSBasicRateSet is > > empty." > > } > > Oh, right. I'll review the patch again I guess :-) > Ok, thanks. Karl