Return-path: Received: from purkki.adurom.net ([80.68.90.206]:40391 "EHLO purkki.adurom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754195Ab3DFFwX (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Apr 2013 01:52:23 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Eugene Krasnikov Cc: Christian Lamparter , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-bluetooth , Adrian Chadd , linux-wireless , ath9k_htc_fw , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Version number policy! References: <201304051903.11215.chunkeey@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 08:52:19 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Eugene Krasnikov's message of "Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:23:54 +0200") Message-ID: <8762008auk.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20130406_075227_805423_72AFDB03) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eugene Krasnikov writes: > Good point regarding timestamp. > > When it comes to feature bitmap do you have an example of such a > bitmap from carl9170? Why not to rely always on major version? I'm with Christian here. In ath6kl we switched to firmware advertising feature capabilities and I have never looked back, it's so much easier. You don't need to do any mapping between firmware versions and features, you just deal one feature at a time. -- Kalle Valo