Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:46463 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753369Ab3D0S3h (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Apr 2013 14:29:37 -0400 Message-ID: <1367085222.8445.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130427_202939_571202_378F8E43) Subject: Re: RFCv5: ST-E CW1200 WLAN driver From: Johannes Berg To: Solomon Peachy Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:53:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130427122717.GA19834@shaftnet.org> (sfid-20130427_142734_758091_A03553EC) References: <1363905589-8350-1-git-send-email-pizza@shaftnet.org> <20130402191327.GA9444@shaftnet.org> <20130427122717.GA19834@shaftnet.org> (sfid-20130427_142734_758091_A03553EC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 08:27 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:13:28PM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:39:34PM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > > I'm satisfied with this driver from a functional standpoint (it handles > > > everything I'm able throw at it) so I'd really like to kick this thing > > > upstairs into wireless-next, assuming it passes muster. > > > > ...anything? > > I'd really like to see some progress on this. What's the next step > towards getting this thing merged? No comments are (usually) good :) > (I have a small handful of additional changes since my v5 patch set > that will be in the next submission; I can submit a v6 patch set, I > suppose) Send the v6 as [PATCH], I'd say. johannes