Return-path: Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.219.43]:42524 "EHLO mail-oa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936202Ab3DHW72 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 18:59:28 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l10so6811089oag.16 for ; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51634BCD.3060304@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20130409_005931_924664_B97DC563) Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:59:25 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean MacLennan CC: David Howells , Greg Kroah-Hartman , viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The rtl8192e procfs-based debug interface seems very broken References: <17570.1365415364@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <51634550.3090300@lwfinger.net> <20130408184615.38b20264@lappy.seanm.ca> In-Reply-To: <20130408184615.38b20264@lappy.seanm.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/08/2013 05:46 PM, Sean MacLennan wrote: > The driver isn't optimal, but I use it daily in one laptop. So it does > work, it just has a few quirks :D > > Is the procfs structure only used for debugging? Unless it is used by > user mode tools, I have never used it. I may try quickly commenting it > out and see if things still work. As far as I know, it is only for debugging. Larry