Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]:62096 "EHLO mail-we0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932705Ab3DFHIg (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Apr 2013 03:08:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8762008auk.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <201304051903.11215.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <8762008auk.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 00:08:34 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20130406_090851_654494_C7E18EB7) Subject: Re: Version number policy! From: Adrian Chadd To: Kalle Valo Cc: Eugene Krasnikov , Christian Lamparter , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-bluetooth , linux-wireless , ath9k_htc_fw , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 5 April 2013 22:52, Kalle Valo wrote: > Eugene Krasnikov writes: > >> Good point regarding timestamp. >> >> When it comes to feature bitmap do you have an example of such a >> bitmap from carl9170? Why not to rely always on major version? > > I'm with Christian here. In ath6kl we switched to firmware advertising > feature capabilities and I have never looked back, it's so much easier. > You don't need to do any mapping between firmware versions and features, > you just deal one feature at a time. Ok. Well, we've got plenty of time to finalise this before things get established. There's still plenty of tidying up to do before we start pushing in new features. Thanks for all your feedback so far! Adrian