Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:54571 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756134Ab3DRNuL (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:50:11 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id d49so1324813eek.33 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:46:02 +0200 From: Karl Beldan To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless , Karl Beldan , Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mac80211: minstrel_ht: initialize rates selection Message-ID: <20130418134602.GF8638@magnum.frso.rivierawaves.com> (sfid-20130418_155016_517333_AD2E4E0D) References: <1366287981-24134-1-git-send-email-karl.beldan@gmail.com> <1366287981-24134-2-git-send-email-karl.beldan@gmail.com> <20130418124050.GD8638@magnum.frso.rivierawaves.com> <1366292199.8336.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <1366292199.8336.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:36:39PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 14:40 +0200, Karl Beldan wrote: > > Johannes, Felix, > > > > This seems to me like an important enough issue to IMHO, make it into > > 3.9/-stable. But since we only have a few days before Linus tags the 3.9 > > I understand the boldness of the thought. > > I'm not going to try for 3.9, it wouldn't happen anyway, but if you want > to tag them as Cc stable it's your call. I'm not familiar enough with > the code to really be able to judge the impact I guess. It seems > unlikely to me though that some device would support MCS 1 but not MCS > 0, or MCS 9 but not 8, etc.? > I imagined devices that would have their -supported MCSes configure their hw- that for any reason would not "handle" other ones. I don't know why I deemed it that important, and agree with you and Felix ;) Karl