Return-path: Received: from he.sipsolutions.net ([78.46.109.217]:43155 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753717Ab3DMQS0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:18:26 -0400 Message-ID: <1365869899.1089.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130413_181832_851013_7C4187B4) Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] mwl8k: don't expose non-standard rates From: Johannes Berg To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Jonas Gorski , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , Nishant Sarmukadam , Yogesh Ashok Powar , Lennert Buytenhek Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 18:18:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20130413_162928_260950_E23BA078) References: <1365849071-2389-1-git-send-email-jogo@openwrt.org> (sfid-20130413_162928_260950_E23BA078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 07:29 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > On 13 April 2013 03:31, Jonas Gorski wrote: > > Do not advertise the non standard rates 22 Mbps and 72 Mbps to mac80211, > > they will make it into the probe responses and cause clients checking them > > to refuse association, e.g. wpa_supplicant says: > > Are these "turbo" mode rates? ie, 40MHz wide channels with pre-11n > rates on them? 22 actually *is* a standard rate, it's just that almost nobody implements it. The original problem seems a bit strange though, seems those should just not be marked basic? johannes