Return-path: Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:42340 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751514Ab3EXXSx (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2013 19:18:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 17:18:46 -0600 From: Jake Edge To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [RFT/RFC 0/4] iwlegacy: workaround for firmware frame tx rejection Message-ID: <20130524171846.54f3d0be@chukar.edge2.net> (sfid-20130525_011909_310230_C37698EB) In-Reply-To: <1369311660-15378-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> References: <1369311660-15378-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:20:56 +0200 Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > Jake, please test this set and check if it not cause association > problems you reported earlier this month. I won't be able to get to this for 10 days or so ... I just got to Japan, so the AP in question is thousands of miles east :) maybe they will use passive channel(s) at LinuxCon Japan on the wireless? Not sure, but if I can figure that out, I'll try out the code ... jake -- Jake Edge - LWN - jake@lwn.net - http://lwn.net