Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:51542 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751599Ab3EGPDg (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 11:03:36 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.16]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MMZH6-1UdZBQ3XZu-008KJH for ; Tue, 07 May 2013 17:03:34 +0200 Message-ID: <518917C4.9090607@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130507_170339_496415_8B6284C7) Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 17:03:32 +0200 From: Oleksij Rempel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Bither CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg , radiotap@NetBSD.org Subject: Re: Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS References: <518127ED.9060900@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130501_163425_421280_1DE3F635) <1367527479.11375.19.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5188AFFE.6070804@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130507_094050_709302_8E653F0F) <1367934867.8328.31.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1367934904.8328.32.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <518916D1.4070902@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <518916D1.4070902@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 07.05.2013 16:59, schrieb Jonathan Bither: > > > On 05/07/2013 09:55 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:54 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 09:40 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >>>> Am 02.05.2013 22:44, schrieb Johannes Berg: >>>>> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:34 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> With this I believe we have everything needed to start the 3 week >>>>>>> comment period. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, I guess there was plenty of time. I would have preferred a >>>>> separate thread, but I guess there's little enough traffic on this >>>>> list >>>>> so it doesn't really matter. >>>>> >>>>>> There is a bit more then 3 week now. I would like to have this >>>>>> approved :) >>>>>> Are there any thing needed to finish this? >>>>> >>>>> http://www.radiotap.org/Standardisation >>>>> >>>>> johannes >>>>> >>>> >>>> ping. >>>> >>>> Johannes, are you the one who says last word on standardisation for >>>> radiotap? >>> >>> No? I thought the link made that pretty clear. >>> >>> But since nobody poked holes in this and it's been a long time, I think >>> you should probably just post "this has been adopted now" ... >> >> Or actually, go to step 5, preferably reposting it as a separate thread. > It looks as if someone already proposed this as a suggested field on > '2012-05-14 23:49:35' without any replies as far as I can tell. > http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS%20extension%20for%20STBC%20and%20Ness Yes, Simon did it last year. I send this link on my first email... In my opinion, this should be just ACKed. Every thing what was needed to do, is already done. -- Regards, Oleksij