Return-path: Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.38]:38448 "EHLO sabertooth02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757321Ab3EOPSO (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2013 11:18:14 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Johannes Berg CC: , Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/29] ath10k: add bmi.h References: <20130515143356.4492.43033.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20130515144254.4492.14914.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <1368630093.20897.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 18:17:53 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1368630093.20897.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (Johannes Berg's message of "Wed, 15 May 2013 17:01:33 +0200") Message-ID: <871u98p90e.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20130515_171821_545327_754FAC05) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Berg writes: > On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:42 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> +/* >> + * Bootloader Messaging Interface (BMI) > > This looks exactly like ath6kl, but is it? Seems it might have potential > for sharing the code. Somewhere deep down ath10k and ath6kl have common history, but the firmware engineers have made so many changes everywhere that IMHO trying to share code is not really worth it. -- Kalle Valo