Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:53572 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759277Ab3EGJQN (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 05:16:13 -0400 Message-ID: <1367918136.8328.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130507_111632_856371_FFA95DD8) Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (b43/bcma) From: Johannes Berg To: Larry Finger Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless , b43-dev@lists.infradead.org Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 11:15:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <51886FAF.1030801@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20130507_051212_785834_D4BC17E9) References: <20130506144207.c812a0227d7763d26e5fec80@canb.auug.org.au> <5187EB95.2060605@infradead.org> <51886FAF.1030801@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20130507_051212_785834_D4BC17E9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 22:06 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > > Probably mostly due to B43=y and BCMA=m. > > Does any Kconfig wizard know the magic incantation to accomplish the following: > > 1. Ensure that if SSB and BMCA are both selected, then both are either "m" or "y" I think one of them being m and the other y should be OK? But do they have interdependencies? > 2. Ensure that BRCMSMAC is not "y" if BMCA is "m". Isn't that a simple depends on BCMA or maybe it can work w/o BCMA, then you'd have depends on BCMA || !BCMA > 3. Ensure that B43 is not "y" if SSB and/or BCMA is "m". same. johannes