Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:48657 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756985Ab3EVTm1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 15:42:27 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hi5so4068443wib.12 for ; Wed, 22 May 2013 12:42:26 -0700 (PDT) References: <1368878635-4455-1-git-send-email-stf_xl@wp.pl> <20130522190145.GJ2113@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <20130522190145.GJ2113@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <54CB38BA-6701-4249-ADFA-761B3C95C084@gmail.com> (sfid-20130522_214234_626768_0FD6AC51) Cc: "stf_xl@wp.pl" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" , "ivdoorn@gmail.com" , Helmut Schaa From: Gertjan van Wingerde Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/32] BBP initialization split Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 21:42:23 +0200 To: "John W. Linville" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: John, Sent from my iPad On 22 mei 2013, at 21:01, "John W. Linville" wrote: > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 02:03:23PM +0200, stf_xl@wp.pl wrote: >> This series spits big and messy rt2800_init_bbp() procedure into small >> per chip (or few similar chips) subroutines. > > Lots of refactoring here -- I trust Stanislaw, but it might be nice > to see an ACK from Gertjan, Helmut, and/or Ivo? I believe Helmut already acked it, but I don't have issues with the patch set. So, you can add my Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde to the whole series. --- Gertjan