Return-path: Received: from mail-qe0-f53.google.com ([209.85.128.53]:37627 "EHLO mail-qe0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753506Ab3EGGQV (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 02:16:21 -0400 Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id cz11so107187qeb.26 for ; Mon, 06 May 2013 23:16:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5187C502.10407@gmail.com> References: <5187C502.10407@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 09:16:20 +0300 Message-ID: (sfid-20130507_081626_584504_C1332FB1) Subject: Re: RT5390 rev 0503 problems From: wireless newbie To: Xose Vazquez Perez Cc: "users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Yes, that is exactly the same patch that I used. It does it's job fixing my signal levels with one antenna. I was just wondering if there could be something else that is different with this revision, because the performance seems to be worse than with rt3070 on same environment. 2013/5/6 Xose Vazquez Perez : > wireless newbie wrote: > >> Has anyone experience with Ralink RT5390 chip with revision 0503? I >> have that chip on my wireless usb module (WPER-172gn). I'm able to use >> only one antenna with it but it has very poor rx signal level that >> way. Adding second antenna for testing purposes clearly improves rx >> level but that is no option for me. >> >> I noticed in the list that someone had same sort of problem with >> rt5390 rev 1502. Problem was hardware antenna diversity that wasn't >> handled properly on the driver. Driver patch was provided to fix that. >> I applied those same changes for rev 0503 and that solved my rx level >> problem too. > > is it like this ? > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=134136097328697