Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:44021 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753846Ab3EGQmt (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 12:42:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:42:36 -0500 From: Seth Forshee To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Johannes Berg , Marcel Holtmann , Larry Finger , Matt Chen , joeyli , linux-wireless Subject: Re: Linux summit this year ? Message-ID: <20130507164236.GD32496@thinkpad-t410> (sfid-20130507_184252_735641_5394FBF1) References: <20130225143201.GA6455@tuxdriver.com> <1361809785.3902.19.camel@aeonflux> <512BAED0.2000507@lwfinger.net> <20130225211207.GE6455@tuxdriver.com> <1361892097.3902.34.camel@aeonflux> <1367522831.11375.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20130502194308.GC2050@tuxdriver.com> <1367568670.9430.7.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20130503144947.GF2069@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130503144947.GF2069@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:49:47AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:11:10AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 15:43 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > > > "I'm confirming that we got the space you needed for the Wireless Summit in > > > New Orleans. > > > > > Does that sound alright to everyone? > > > > Sounds good to me. If it overlaps LPC, which one are people going to > > have to register for (if not going to both anyway)? > > I would presume that if you want to got to LPC sessions then you > would have to register for LPC. Generally we have required Wireless > Summit attendees to register for LinuxCon, and I presume that would > be required this time (so both LinuxCon and LPC if you want the > LPC sessions). Why require LinuxCon registration rather than LPC? I'd assume most wireless summit attendees are more interested in plumbers than LinuxCon. Could the summit just require registration at one or the other?