Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:40199 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932905Ab3ECOxU (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2013 10:53:20 -0400 Message-ID: <1367592778.13104.37.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130503_165323_357244_9C760870) Subject: Re: Linux summit this year ? From: Johannes Berg To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Larry Finger , Matt Chen , joeyli , linux-wireless Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 16:52:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130503144947.GF2069@tuxdriver.com> References: <20130225143201.GA6455@tuxdriver.com> <1361809785.3902.19.camel@aeonflux> <512BAED0.2000507@lwfinger.net> <20130225211207.GE6455@tuxdriver.com> <1361892097.3902.34.camel@aeonflux> <1367522831.11375.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20130502194308.GC2050@tuxdriver.com> <1367568670.9430.7.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20130503144947.GF2069@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 10:49 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > Sounds good to me. If it overlaps LPC, which one are people going to > > have to register for (if not going to both anyway)? > > I would presume that if you want to got to LPC sessions then you > would have to register for LPC. Generally we have required Wireless > Summit attendees to register for LinuxCon, and I presume that would > be required this time (so both LinuxCon and LPC if you want the > LPC sessions). That's what I figured, would just be good to announce it (you're going to send an invitation email once plans are finalized, right? :) ) > Alternatively, probably we could have a separate Wireless Summit > registration -- not sure what that will cost, but it probably won't > be zero. That seems far too much overhead, and people who are there likely want to attend some other sessions anyway. > Probably can have an easel w/ a big note pad Sure, that's almost equivalent and much easier I guess. No need to inquire otherwise. johannes