Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:35977 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751576Ab3EJJeO (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 May 2013 05:34:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1368178449.8390.10.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130510_113417_146793_9F883227) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add support for 5 and 10 MHz channels From: Johannes Berg To: Simon Wunderlich Cc: Adrian Chadd , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Kretschmer , Simon Wunderlich Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 11:34:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130510093241.GA28714@pandem0nium> References: <1368170776.8390.4.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20130510093241.GA28714@pandem0nium> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 11:32 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > Yes interoperability would be nice of course - I'll re-work the patchset > to use the according half and quarter rates. Meanwhile, what do you guys think > about enabling HT too? I'd like to stick to the standard first. Enabling HT is nice for us, but I'd like to see it done in a way that doesn't clash with a possible future amendment doing it officially. johannes