Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:50953 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753495Ab3EFPMA (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2013 11:12:00 -0400 Message-ID: <1367853112.8434.6.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130506_171221_462059_3EEF5B8E) Subject: Re: Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 From: Johannes Berg To: Jake Edge Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, lkml Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 17:11:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130505143803.7e46e4c6@chukar.edge2.net> (sfid-20130505_223826_138840_12AE724B) References: <20130505143803.7e46e4c6@chukar.edge2.net> (sfid-20130505_223826_138840_12AE724B) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jake, > commit 1672c0e31917f49d31d30d79067103432bc20cc7 > Author: Johannes Berg > Date: Tue Jan 29 15:02:27 2013 +0100 > > mac80211: start auth/assoc timeout on frame status > > but I can't (easily) revert that in 3.9 (maybe I can in -rc1 or > something? haven't tried that) > > What more information is needed from me? I may still mess around with > trying to revert that patch just to nail it down for sure, but two > separate bisection exercises ended up at the same place. Thanks for the report. Is the AP on a passive channel by any chance (5 GHz, or channels 12/13)? johannes