Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:45138 "EHLO mail-la0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752408Ab3EOX0k (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2013 19:26:40 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fo13so2386710lab.11 for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 16:26:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:26:38 -0600 Message-ID: (sfid-20130516_012644_176673_5F8F652D) Subject: Re: STA doesn't support ACM for QoS From: Cyril Segretain To: Ben Greear Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2013/5/15 Ben Greear : > On 05/15/2013 03:42 PM, Cyril Seg wrote: >> >> Hello , >> >> In my testbed, there is an AP that works with ath9k_htc and hostapd and >> there >> also are 2 STAs that work with ath9k_htc. >> Video flows aren't in the good priority, they are in Best_Effort. >> But if I enable the ACM parameter for VIDEO and BEST EFFORT, video flows >> are >> now in BACKGROUND priority. >> STAs doesn't support the admission control ... >> >> Does someone have a solution ? >> >> I work with Kali Linux, kernel 3.7 > > > See what ToS bits are in your video frames. Some definitions > of ToS had low values for video (32), but wifi requires different > settings (something like 128). > The ToS for Video Streaming should be at 160. But in my testbed all ToS bits are 0. I don't know why... > Thanks, > Ben > > > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Cyril Segretain >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" >> in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > > -- > Ben Greear > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >