Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:50708 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754978Ab3EHNUl (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2013 09:20:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 08:20:30 -0500 From: Seth Forshee To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Johannes Berg , Marcel Holtmann , Larry Finger , Matt Chen , joeyli , linux-wireless Subject: Re: Linux summit this year ? Message-ID: <20130508132030.GA32053@thinkpad-t410> (sfid-20130508_152045_575764_A627E710) References: <1361809785.3902.19.camel@aeonflux> <512BAED0.2000507@lwfinger.net> <20130225211207.GE6455@tuxdriver.com> <1361892097.3902.34.camel@aeonflux> <1367522831.11375.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20130502194308.GC2050@tuxdriver.com> <1367568670.9430.7.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20130503144947.GF2069@tuxdriver.com> <20130507164236.GD32496@thinkpad-t410> <20130507174445.GB2073@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130507174445.GB2073@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 01:44:45PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:42:36AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:49:47AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:11:10AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 15:43 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > > > > > > > "I'm confirming that we got the space you needed for the Wireless Summit in > > > > > New Orleans. > > > > > > > > > Does that sound alright to everyone? > > > > > > > > Sounds good to me. If it overlaps LPC, which one are people going to > > > > have to register for (if not going to both anyway)? > > > > > > I would presume that if you want to got to LPC sessions then you > > > would have to register for LPC. Generally we have required Wireless > > > Summit attendees to register for LinuxCon, and I presume that would > > > be required this time (so both LinuxCon and LPC if you want the > > > LPC sessions). > > > > Why require LinuxCon registration rather than LPC? I'd assume most > > wireless summit attendees are more interested in plumbers than LinuxCon. > > Could the summit just require registration at one or the other? > > Well, I can ask. But the fact is that LPC and LCNA are separate > events with separate events with separate budgets and expenses, > separate organizers, etc. > > Anyway, I'll let you know what the event folks say... It's not really a big deal for me, I just thought it a bit odd since the audiences for wireless summit and LPC probably have more overlap. The reasons you and Marcel gave make sense. Thanks, Seth