Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:60337 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756248Ab3FMJCr (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 05:02:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:02:09 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Linux Wireless , Linux NFC Subject: Re: [GIT] [3.10] NFC fixes Message-ID: <20130613090209.GA7998@zurbaran> (sfid-20130613_110250_747815_816E03AB) References: <20130606152019.GT4793@zurbaran> <20130612182238.GG11589@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130612182238.GG11589@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi John, On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:22:38PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > Given recent events, I'm not sure that this is really acceptable as > a fix request. The service bit and endianness in particular don't > sound like they are addressing big problems, and the other two don't > sound like they are really fixing any regressions either. > > Can these wait for 3.11? I guess so, although they really are fixes. I'll queue them in nfc-next and will send you a pull request. Btw, are you going to merge wireless into wireless-next soon ? Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/