Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:39212 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932490Ab3FRO1K (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:27:10 -0400 Message-ID: <1371565626.8318.26.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130618_162725_009615_0760E8FB) Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 07/18] mac80211: add radiotap flag and handling for 5/10 MHz From: Johannes Berg To: Simon Wunderlich Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Kretschmer , Simon Wunderlich Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:27:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1368702045-27598-8-git-send-email-siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> References: <1368702045-27598-1-git-send-email-siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> <1368702045-27598-8-git-send-email-siwu@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 13:00 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > Wireshark doesn't really matter all that much, but I guess the radiotap standard also defines it. > + RX_FLAG_10MHZ = BIT(26), > + RX_FLAG_5MHZ = BIT(27), Does that make sense? We know what kind of channel we're on? Though it might be easier for the driver, so it may make sense I guess. johannes