Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:61987 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932951Ab3FFMGP (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 08:06:15 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.29]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LpiUy-1U8jpL3kGM-00fV4b for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:06:13 +0200 Message-ID: <51B07B33.2060207@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130606_140620_564950_D605182B) Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:06:11 +0200 From: Oleksij Rempel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Helmut Schaa CC: Marc Kleine-Budde , linux-wireless , ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: fix skb_under_panic error References: <51ADBC01.6090202@blackshift.org> <1370371064-6903-1-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de> <51AF4AA7.6050005@blackshift.org> <51AF4F35.50503@rempel-privat.de> <51AF6F5D.5020400@rempel-privat.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 06.06.2013 13:48, schrieb Helmut Schaa: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> I was running two stream netperf test for 2 hours without visible >> regressions. > > With or without your pskb_expand_head patch applied? > > Thanks, > Helmut > whithout my patch, on to of wireless-testing master git. But i didn't had this problem before. So, may be this scenario was not used by me. Shouldn't we actually have this check from my patch, to avoid other oopses? -- Regards, Oleksij