Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:60248 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757337Ab3FMPaK (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:30:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:18:22 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Samuel Ortiz Cc: Linux Wireless , Linux NFC Subject: Re: [GIT] [3.10] NFC fixes Message-ID: <20130613151821.GA3246@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20130613_173019_173118_CAABDEC0) References: <20130606152019.GT4793@zurbaran> <20130612182238.GG11589@tuxdriver.com> <20130613090209.GA7998@zurbaran> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20130613090209.GA7998@zurbaran> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:02:09AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi John, > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 02:22:38PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > Given recent events, I'm not sure that this is really acceptable as > > a fix request. The service bit and endianness in particular don't > > sound like they are addressing big problems, and the other two don't > > sound like they are really fixing any regressions either. > > > > Can these wait for 3.11? > I guess so, although they really are fixes. I don't doubt that they are fixes, but I think that Dave is trying to clamp down to only 'important' fixes -- data loss, crashes, etc. > I'll queue them in nfc-next and will send you a pull request. > Btw, are you going to merge wireless into wireless-next soon ? I merged the wireless tree into wireless-next yesterday. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.