Return-path: Received: from [78.193.33.39] ([78.193.33.39]:45980 "EHLO qult.net" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934566Ab3FSTgd (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:36:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:36:24 +0200 From: Ignacy Gawedzki To: Ben Greear Cc: Oleksij Rempel , Johannes Berg , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Corey Richardson Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc: station unable to authenticate Message-ID: <20130619193624.GB29582@zenon.in.qult.net> (sfid-20130619_213637_665987_CF0EFD8E) References: <51C1ACEC.2020703@rempel-privat.de> <1DC40B07CD6EC041A66726C271A73AE61AA312F5@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <51C1B467.1030509@rempel-privat.de> <20130619140905.GA14079@zenon.in.qult.net> <1371651073.8349.19.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <51C1C95C.8030301@rempel-privat.de> <20130619175939.GA19405@zenon.in.qult.net> <20130619180354.GB19405@zenon.in.qult.net> <51C1FA76.3090109@rempel-privat.de> <51C1FAFB.9090209@candelatech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <51C1FAFB.9090209@candelatech.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:39:55AM -0700, thus spake Ben Greear: > Does the ath9k_htc do it's own rate control, perhaps modelled on > ath9k_rate_control algorithm? Do you mean ATH9K_LEGACY_RATE_CONTROL ? > If so, that could be the problem...it has issues with associating when > network conditions are poor... Frankly, I doubt this is the case. With so many different setups, and the AP is like one meter away from the station right now. -- The groove will take you through times without money much better than money will take you through times without groove.