Return-path: Received: from linicks.net ([87.127.191.50]:48651 "EHLO mail.linicks.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751454Ab3FLMBm (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:01:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:01:41 +0100 From: Nick Warne To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [QUERY] Intel Centrino Wireless-N 100 modules vs built-in Message-ID: <20130612120141.GB10459@sauron> (sfid-20130612_140145_406554_B6406F7F) References: <20130612112326.GA10313@sauron> <1371037816.8601.13.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1371038139.8601.15.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1371038139.8601.15.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 01:55:39PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > Newer versions of udev don't > > respond negatively if they don't have the firmware while running from > > initrd/initramfs, and will leave the driver's request pending to be > > answered once the real filesystem is mounted. > > And by "newer", I really mean "anything not ancient", the version with > the logic was 187, released almost a year ago :-) I will have to wait for debian/ubuntu/mint to catch up then :) Nick -- Free Software Foundation Associate Member 5508 http://linicks.net/