Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:38893 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751411Ab3FKTxz (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:53:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1370980419.8356.68.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130611_215358_476304_9E2F846A) Subject: Re: [PATCH] carl9170: make use of the new rate control API From: Johannes Berg To: Christian Lamparter Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=FChn?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:53:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <201306112149.09768.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (sfid-20130611_214914_098355_4B143C81) References: <1370966237-27716-1-git-send-email-thomas@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> <1E3747D2-BD9C-4136-B17F-9227E24136D5@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> <1370978668.8356.67.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <201306112149.09768.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (sfid-20130611_214914_098355_4B143C81) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 21:49 +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > As I just saw an ath9k patch for rcu protection when ieee80211_get_tx_rates() is called. > > > Should this be done in carl9170 as well ? > > > > I think that patch is wrong actually, probably should just do the rcu > > protection inside the function. However the patch is completely wrong > > anyway (C isn't python) so ... > Uh, that's confusing. We are now talking about the patch from Thomas, right? > If so: the previous "new rate control api" feature patch for carl9170 should > be fine in this regard. No, Calvin Owens's patch. johannes