Return-path: Received: from mail-qe0-f44.google.com ([209.85.128.44]:34439 "EHLO mail-qe0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934150Ab3FSPLn (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:11:43 -0400 Received: by mail-qe0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 5so3297480qeb.17 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:11:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51C1C95C.8030301@rempel-privat.de> References: <20130619115809.GA26717@zenon.in.qult.net> <51C1ACEC.2020703@rempel-privat.de> <1DC40B07CD6EC041A66726C271A73AE61AA312F5@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <51C1B467.1030509@rempel-privat.de> <20130619140905.GA14079@zenon.in.qult.net> <1371651073.8349.19.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <51C1C95C.8030301@rempel-privat.de> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:11:42 -0400 Message-ID: (sfid-20130619_171146_845310_F8C82A7D) Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k_htc: station unable to authenticate From: Corey Richardson To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: Johannes Berg , Ignacy Gawedzki , "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Am 19.06.2013 16:11, schrieb Johannes Berg: >> >> Btw, I'm a bit confused -- are you using ath9k_htc as per the subject, >> or ath9k? >> >> if it's ath9k_htc then I don't really understand why the patch that >> *fixed* it for Corey *broke* it for you? >> >> johannes > > > It will be interesting to get some more info from Corey, about his wireless > setup. > It seems many of my issues were related to a faulty WAP, once I replaced it with a different one 90% of my problems went away. What information do you want?