Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:60055 "EHLO mail-la0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753900Ab3GaAxx (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:53:53 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fn20so55236lab.23 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:53:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:53:31 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20130731_025357_256380_141CDEED) Subject: 802.11 infrastructure for regression testing - upstream / mac80211 / cfg80211 To: linux-wireless Cc: Ben Greear , Paul Stewart , Felix Fietkau , Jouni Malinen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Folks, Back in 2009 Intel had put out a wifi-test tree [0] but that seems deprecated now. The git tree at least is gone. Can someone confirm if that's dead? We later had Google present at the 2010 San Francisco wireless summit [1] their test infrastructure using autotest. Last I checked that stuff was not merged back upstream to autotest. Can someone confirm ? Lastly we have mac80211_hwsim [2] and also a slew of internal testing infrastructures that obviously are not open. If we are to embark on a new journey towards an open testing infrastructure what should be used? Ben, you have some stuff, and I know you also report some interesting bugs with insane amount of stations. Is any of it open? AFAICT mac80211_hwism should and likely already is used for a slew of core API changes / tests. Addressing testing using that shoud hopefully address tons of testings and find a lot of issues. We'd then just need vendors to replicate behaviour on top of their drivers. The core test stuff though still needs to be available. What do we have, anyone have any lofty plans? [0] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Testing/wifi-test [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Summits/SanFranciscoBayArea-2010 [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/mac80211_hwsim Luis