Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:59685 "EHLO mail-wg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753652Ab3GWHNy (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:13:54 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f11so6634645wgh.3 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:13:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6487488.19IqyPtizJ@lx-vladimir> References: <1374374808-12768-1-git-send-email-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <1958736.oRuXAUfNGd@lx-vladimir> <20130722161554.GR17130@pogo> <6487488.19IqyPtizJ@lx-vladimir> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:13:32 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20130723_091357_614432_A51E048F) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath: wil6210: Fix build error To: Vladimir Kondratiev Cc: linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: > On Monday, July 22, 2013 09:17:01 AM Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:06:31AM +0300, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: >> > Hmm, I have no warning for this with neither 3.10 nor 3.11 kernel version; but >> > patch is correct, and here is my >> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev >> >> If you agree with a patch you don't say you Sign-off-by it as well, >> you say Acked-by. The Signed-off-by tag has a very specific meaning >> from development to a maintainer's hands, and its definition is on >> the Developer Certificate or Origin. >> >> So in this case Acked-by is better. >> >> Luis > > > > I thought that I need to add Signed-off-by: as driver's maintainer, because > (quote Documentation/SubmittingPatches): > --- > The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the > development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path. > --- > > This is similar to other maintainers adding its Signed-off-by:. > Or, is driver's maintainer an exception from the rule quoted above? If you had a git tree, sure, otherwise not in this case. Luis