Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com ([74.125.82.171]:47500 "EHLO mail-we0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933539Ab3GPUTA (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:19:00 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id m46so1037820wev.16 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:18:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1372899889-19183-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> References: <1372899889-19183-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:18:38 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20130716_221904_494197_E693A599) Subject: Re: [RFC 00/53] wireless-regdb: mostly VHT80 updates To: "John W. Linville" Cc: "wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org" , linux-wireless , "Luis R. Rodriguez" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > Here's a series of updates for wireless-regdb. Most of this is > to just enable VHT80 support to enable support for 802.11ac > where this has been verified to be usable. I cannot meet the > criteria of providing full documentation for sources for all > patches, only a few ones so what I recommend for the rest is > to let this sit on the list for a bit and I'd hope after > review if no one spots any issues I'd hope we can merge this. > > I reviewed the idea of vendor namespaces on wireless-regdb > and at least through review with pkgadd on IRC we concluded > its best to try to take this approach instead of encouraging > divergence due to any lack of full source documentation or > inability to provide such documentation for whatever reason. > This seems to be better than not getting any updates at all > and keeps vendors hopefully encouraged to push changes upstream. I saw one comment addressing a typo on ID, I've fixed that. If there are no complaints can we merge these to get VHT80? Luis