Return-path: Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]:57581 "EHLO sabertooth01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751979Ab3GIPlr (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:41:47 -0400 From: Vladimir Kondratiev To: Johannes Berg CC: , "Luis R . Rodriguez" , "John W . Linville" , Jouni Malinen , Arend van Spriel , Ilan Peer Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] cfg80211: add 'flags' to cfg80211_rx_mgmt() Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:41:42 +0300 Message-ID: <2129661.ryxWndVai2@lx-vladimir> (sfid-20130709_174150_408988_00F71F42) In-Reply-To: <1373382929.8241.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1372331863-14083-1-git-send-email-qca_vkondrat@qca.qualcomm.com> <2816930.mUJMdCmsNg@lx-vladimir> <1373382929.8241.3.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 05:15:29 PM Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 17:37 +0300, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: > > Flags intended to report various auxiliary information. > > Introduced flag NL80211_RXMGMT_FLAG_REPLIED to report > > whether frame was replied by the device/driver. > > This looks fine to me, but the patch is line-wrapped and won't apply: > > > @@ -608,8 +608,7 @@ static int ath6kl_wmi_rx_action_event_rx(struct wmi *wmi, > > u8 *datap, int len, > > > > You also sent me at least three versions of it and I don't really want > to figure out what that meant. > > johannes > My mailing system went crazy for couple of days. Sorry for this. All versions should be the same. I'll resend anyway, as patch 2 require some edition. Thanks, Vladimir