Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:34241 "EHLO mail-wg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932832Ab3GWVgy (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:36:54 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m15so2157135wgh.17 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51EEF771.7030102@free.fr> (sfid-20130723_233656_907232_709F8AB3) Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:36:49 +0200 From: Etienne Champetier Reply-To: etienne.champetier@free.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@lists.open80211s.org Subject: Re: authsae, 'ath9k nohwcrypt=1' & AR9100 References: <800088722.345614075.1374079656592.JavaMail.root@zimbra65-e11.priv.proxad.net> In-Reply-To: <800088722.345614075.1374079656592.JavaMail.root@zimbra65-e11.priv.proxad.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Le 17/07/2013 18:47, etienne.champetier@free.fr a écrit : > Hi > > I'm making some test with authsae on openrwt and for wr1043nd router (AR9100 wireless) i still need 'ath9k nohwcrypt=1' > for the secure mesh to work when on another router (AR9280 wireless) i don't need it. > Is it a drivers bug? or is it hardware? > > -Router A: wr1043nd (need nohwcrypt=1 option) > -AR9100 wireless > -authsae - 2013-06-25-e2f67612101dc83f2c459d8ddc75c34bc83e1e83 (https://github.com/cozybit/authsae/tree/e2f67612101dc83f2c459d8ddc75c34bc83e1e83) > -kmod-ath9k - 3.10.1+2013-06-27-1 (backports-20130617-4-ge3220f5) > -openwrt BB r37364 > > -Router B: ubnt rspro > -AR9280 wireless it's an AR9220 wireless (Mikrotik RB R52Hn), recognized as AR9280 > -openwrt BB r37369 (same authsae/ath9k) > > Thanks in advance > Etienne This patch http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=a549459c96ba99a691aa1cafeabdd327a7a2bfcf make AR9160 and previous (AR9100) run in promiscuous mode (in order to catch all frames), does this influence hardware encryption (hwcrypt)? Thanks in advance Etienne