Return-path: Received: from mms3.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.19]:3011 "EHLO mms3.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752547Ab3HNSQs (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:16:48 -0400 Message-ID: <520BC97E.9070505@broadcom.com> (sfid-20130814_201652_163917_C232A1B0) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 20:16:30 +0200 From: "Arend van Spriel" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David Herrmann" cc: linux-wireless , "Jonas Gorski" , "Maximilian Engelhardt" , "David Costa" Subject: Re: [RFT 00/13] brcmsmac: bcm4313 iPA related patches References: <1376424220-10765-1-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com> <520A9B0D.3050006@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/14/2013 12:33 PM, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 08/13/2013 10:09 PM, David Herrmann wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Arend van Spriel >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This series replaces the patch "[PATCH 12/12] brcmsmac: support 4313iPA" >>>> with Message-ID: <1376130450-29746-13-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com>. >>>> >>>> It has been split up into individual patches. Please test this series >>>> especially if you had issues with the original commit b6fc28a that was >>>> reverted. >>>> >>>> Cc: Jonas Gorski >>>> Cc: David Herrmann >>>> Cc: Maximilian Engelhardt >>>> Cc: David Costa >>> >>> >>> Is this available in a public branch that I can merge? And what should >>> be used as base? 3.11-rc5? linux-next? >> >> >> Indeed I should have mentioned. It applies on v3.11-rc5 for sure. Did not >> try linux-next. > > All 13 patches applied cleanly on top of 3.11-rc5, everything works > fine even after a dozen of reconnects to different networks. No > additional delays. > > Consider this whole series: > Tested-by: David Herrmann > > card info: Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n (0a5c:219c) > (builtin into my old Intel Atom N450 board) > I tested with 802.11g networks. I have only a/g networks here. I don't > know whether that matters. As this series modifies the phy code, I would say no. Thanks for verifying this works for you. Regards, Arend