Return-path: Received: from canardo.mork.no ([148.122.252.1]:49690 "EHLO canardo.mork.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756542Ab3HMLjl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:39:41 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH 00/53] wireless-regdb: latest updates References: <1374027522-18488-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:13:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1374027522-18488-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> (Luis R. Rodriguez's message of "Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:17:49 -0700") Message-ID: <87mwolc08r.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (sfid-20130813_133945_338190_5EF36DDF) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: "Luis R. Rodriguez" writes: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > I saw one comment posted about the Indonesia patch, I fixed that. > I also then ran some sanity tests with a new reglib addition > wich I recently posted. This helped find two cases which > required disabling VHT80 for two countries on a specific band. > One was for US for 5690 and another for TW for 5290. In both cases > the reason is due to the fact that the only way to use VHT80 is > to combine two frequency ranges together that are contiguous and > apply the most restrictive band rules for that range. We don't support > this yet so just disable VHT80 in both cases. In the US case this > also seems to be the preferred ruling. Hello, Out of personal interest I'm wondering why you excluded Norway and Iceland from this series? As EEA [1] members they pretty much follow all relevant EU regulations, like for example the R&TTE directive. And the CEPT documents should also be pretty clear wrt VHT80 support. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Economic_Area Bjørn