Return-path: Received: from mail.allnet.de ([212.18.29.59]:19499 "EHLO mail.allnet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752551Ab3H0I2W (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 04:28:22 -0400 Message-ID: <521C61AC.9020508@allnet.de> (sfid-20130827_102843_657450_018A31EA) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:22:04 +0200 From: Daniel Golle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislaw Gruszka CC: Paul Menzel , Fabien ADAM , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com" Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH 3.11] rt2800: fix wrong TX power compensation References: <20130826131851.GB10525@redhat.com> <1377548398.4408.4.camel@mattotaupa> <20130827080001.GA2609@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130827080001.GA2609@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/27/2013 10:00 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:19:58PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: >> Could you please add which ones you have tested? > > I checked 2 devices (3071 & 3070) but they have EXTERNAL_TX_ALC bit set. > I assume the fix is correct based on vendor driver and it fixes devices > which have no EXTERNAL_TX_ACL, but I can not tell what chipset that are. > Is possible that the same chipset can be configured with and without > EXTERNAL_TX_ALC. At least for SoC (3352 and 5350) I know that there are devices with (e.g. DIR-615 rev.H1) and without EXTERNAL_TX_ALC (e.g. ALL5002). I guess the same applies for PCI modules.