Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:53915 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754020Ab3HAHhC (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 03:37:02 -0400 Message-ID: <1375342617.8608.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20130801_093722_185131_3C1B6C20) Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] introduce chan_time parameter to scan request From: Johannes Berg To: Michal Kazior Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:36:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1375087158-22077-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> References: <1375087158-22077-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:39 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > I'm wondering if it would be okay to set swscan > probe delay to 0 if chan_time is non-zero? Or does > probe delay need to be non-zero? Or maybe it > should also be configurable via a parameter? probe delay needs to be non-zero for NAV adjustment. johannes