Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1235 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752891Ab3H0IBz (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 04:01:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:00:02 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Paul Menzel Cc: "John W. Linville" , Fabien ADAM , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH 3.11] rt2800: fix wrong TX power compensation Message-ID: <20130827080001.GA2609@redhat.com> (sfid-20130827_100157_688743_F20E981C) References: <20130826131851.GB10525@redhat.com> <1377548398.4408.4.camel@mattotaupa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1377548398.4408.4.camel@mattotaupa> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:19:58PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Could you please add which ones you have tested? I checked 2 devices (3071 & 3070) but they have EXTERNAL_TX_ALC bit set. I assume the fix is correct based on vendor driver and it fixes devices which have no EXTERNAL_TX_ACL, but I can not tell what chipset that are. Is possible that the same chipset can be configured with and without EXTERNAL_TX_ALC. > Is there a bug report about this? Fabien reported problem on mailing list, I can add that as reference. I hope it also fixes bug reported here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913631 but I haven't get confirmation about that from users yet. Stanislaw