Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:48040 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751652Ab3ITPSA (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:18:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:15:52 -0500 From: Felipe Balbi To: Russell King - ARM Linux CC: Felipe Balbi , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Solarflare linux maintainers , , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH 42/51] DMA-API: usb: musb: use platform_device_register_full() to avoid directly messing with dma masks Message-ID: <20130920151552.GQ26101@radagast> (sfid-20130920_171812_108227_7434BBF9) Reply-To: References: <20130919212235.GD12758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130920131125.GO26101@radagast> <20130920134938.GO25647@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rKoHqF+aPLVth8b2" In-Reply-To: <20130920134938.GO25647@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --rKoHqF+aPLVth8b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:49:38PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 08:11:25AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:14:38AM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > Use platform_device_register_full() for those drivers which can, to > > > avoid messing directly with DMA masks. This can only be done when > > > the driver does not need to access the allocated musb platform device > > > from within its callbacks, which may be called during the musb > > > device probing. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > >=20 > > you want me to carry this one through my tree or you prefer getting my > > Acked-by ? Either way works for me: > >=20 > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi > >=20 > > there's also the third option of me setting up a branch with only this > > patch and we both merge it, that'd also work. >=20 > I think this patch is sufficiently stand-alone that it should be fine > if you want to take it through your tree. That may be better in the > long run to avoid conflicts with this patch and any future work in > this area during this cycle. awesome, i'll take this one early next week. --=20 balbi --rKoHqF+aPLVth8b2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSPGaoAAoJEIaOsuA1yqREE+MP/2yK4ec5lzVPs6fLeF9dUQHh yWwfvqZLfu9D9lFIzGOOgfPm03or8ubh7i/ryfKBHxyKiGysUyo2yen3AwOwFgq1 2VbJzj55Zz5fejj7T9YE2hJPXU3ofUTdkNSJkbOGqnROvzNcCBYorIgcsAceohqP biXh7G8wuxJmJqe967o/LVi9M4GL9ny+GqXdqT7TzuPeFzIwnlDpRL2+vgQDD3Y8 maW6NOBkrF8W7g2qM5qG4oT/LPNyIEAFpJqOYSQ14EgDp0VxviUl4kMDSqihMOM7 iPMQJPMhNKRx8vSUilrRxGCY636T0bSXZd1x6L+AIQ0XsTzEtFT73v929byiFNso bzQpIOgJjrDgUfBi4MnOemhm98+/UhamcqoXq7v6FQ2FyhEMeIgArAIwwr3VxOf1 E7iiKaT7jVMRMcNZ+7UJsb+09vie5hGleu4M7YBayoxDEEtlWI8t0aOcngW8oVO4 DHD3uff/mpbTt9UYf7009WRToHXQwLMhbAimBcXbtya9Nxa79LNxT6aWEzfB2uVS Ju5j7FEQZUsAMHQdJIUu+kpcEjrc5IKWWsedQul4piraIFh2Jb+8ODrGLEQvMq9e 8Jxl6hajoiw6zWfr+HMSqJa3MkDtaZ9GEOyvZqlnrBnpNS4dI3jZKDfresiz1fkq o5bj9gHe6QmYbP9tPOOz =V876 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rKoHqF+aPLVth8b2--