Return-path: Received: from emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.116]:60101 "EHLO emh06.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754934Ab3I3Qxp (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:53:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1380559680.32539.1.camel@paschendale> (sfid-20130930_185348_302018_88E537B7) Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] wlcore: always register dummy hardirq From: Luca Coelho To: Eliad Peller Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:48:00 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1378218848-7853-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <1378218848-7853-12-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <1378799431.4799.63.camel@porter.coelho.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 09:48 +0200, Eliad Peller wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Luca Coelho wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 17:34 +0300, Eliad Peller wrote: > >> From: Arik Nemtsov > >> > >> This keeps the kernel happy when using edge-irqs and requesting a > >> threaded irq. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov > >> Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller > >> --- > > > > Ouch, I think this is not going to fit at all with the DT patches I > > sent. > > > this is quite minor patch (only making sure we always define hardirq > when threaded_irq is used. i don't think it should conflict (at least > logically) with DT patches... It will. Just take a look at my DT patch series. Anyway, I'll apply this for now and whoever (if ever) take over my DT series, will have to make sure it still works. :P -- Cheers, Luca.