Return-path: Received: from canardo.mork.no ([148.122.252.1]:43311 "EHLO canardo.mork.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752039Ab3ICHjh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 03:39:37 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= To: David Miller Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, jiri@resnulli.us, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, j@w1.fi, libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, forest@alittletooquiet.net, stephen@networkplumber.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] set addr_assign_type when inheriting a dev_addr References: <1377878932-26881-1-git-send-email-bjorn@mork.no> <20130831.225057.1874268263797742541.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 09:38:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130831.225057.1874268263797742541.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Sat, 31 Aug 2013 22:50:57 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <87mwnuqrrx.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (sfid-20130903_093944_717058_8AB3570B) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller writes: > From: Bjørn Mork > Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:08:43 +0200 > >> Copying the dev_addr from a parent device is an operation >> common to a number of drivers. The addr_assign_type should >> be updated accordingly, either by reusing the value from >> the source device or explicitly indicating that the address >> is stolen by setting addr_assign_type to NET_ADDR_STOLEN. >> >> This patch set adds a helper copying both the dev_addr and >> the addr_assign_type, and use this helper in drivers which >> don't currently set the addr_assign_type. Using NET_ADDR_STOLEN >> might be more appropriate in some of these cases. Please >> let me know, and I'll update the patch accordingly. >> >> Changes in v2: >> - assuming addr_len == ETH_ALEN to allow optimized memcpy >> - dropped the vt6656 patch due to addr_len being unset in that driver > > Looks good, series applied, thanks. Thanks. But it doesn't look like it ended up in net-next? Or am I missing something (again)? Bjørn