Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0008.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.8]:40055 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752743Ab3IVIWP (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 04:22:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1379838128.2086.6.camel@joe-AO722> (sfid-20130922_102245_665070_CC548E79) Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] wireless: Change variable type to bool From: Joe Perches To: Peter Senna Tschudin Cc: Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 01:22:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1379802471-30252-12-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> References: <1379802471-30252-1-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> <1379802471-30252-12-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 00:27 +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: > The variable continual is only assigned the values true and false. > Change its type to bool. [] > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/efuse.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/efuse.c [] > @@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ static void efuse_power_switch(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 write, u8 pwrstate) > > static u16 efuse_get_current_size(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) > { > - int continual = true; > + bool continual = true; > u16 efuse_addr = 0; > u8 hworden; > u8 efuse_data, word_cnts; Yes, this could use bool, but would probably be better written without continual at all as it is before this patch: static u16 efuse_get_current_size(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) { int continual = true; u16 efuse_addr = 0; u8 hworden; u8 efuse_data, word_cnts; while (continual && efuse_one_byte_read(hw, efuse_addr, &efuse_data) && (efuse_addr < EFUSE_MAX_SIZE)) { if (efuse_data != 0xFF) { hworden = efuse_data & 0x0F; word_cnts = efuse_calculate_word_cnts(hworden); efuse_addr = efuse_addr + (word_cnts * 2) + 1; } else { continual = false; } } return efuse_addr; } I think writing it without continual, which is effectively an ersatz "break", would be better Something like: static u16 efuse_get_current_size(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) { u16 efuse_addr = 0; u8 hworden; u8 efuse_data, word_cnts; while (efuse_one_byte_read(hw, efuse_addr, &efuse_data) && (efuse_addr < EFUSE_MAX_SIZE) { if (efuse_data == 0xff) break; hworden = efuse_data & 0x0F; word_cnts = efuse_calculate_word_cnts(hworden); efuse_addr = efuse_addr + (word_cnts * 2) + 1; } return efuse_addr; }