Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:52333 "EHLO mail-we0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751825Ab3J1S3O (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:29:14 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q58so7157660wes.28 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:29:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <526E20EA.9090203@rempel-privat.de> From: Krishna Chaitanya Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:58:52 +0530 Message-ID: (sfid-20131028_192919_839201_85944DC6) Subject: Re: I always need a miracle to connect with iwlwifi To: Felipe Contreras Cc: Oleksij Rempel , ilw@linux.intel.com, "hostap@lists.shmoo.com" , linux-wireless Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > The authentication response does come back in both cases though, it's > just the acknowledgement that is missing. Unfortunately I cannot > figure out for which message it's the ack. > > Also, I notice the sequence number received from the router doesn't > seem to change. All the authentication requests received have the same > number (256). Another peculiar thing is that in the failed case the SN > we send starts with 0. > > I suppose since the authentication ack never arrives, the next steps > are never completed. > > Does that help? >From the supplicant logs we have successfully received the authentication response and sent out the association request. So are you referring to not receiving ACK for association request?? It would be nice to get the capture without any filters? -- Thanks, Regards, Chaitanya T K. Mobile:+91-9963910010.