Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:59870 "EHLO mail-bk0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756534Ab3JPQBx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:01:53 -0400 Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mx11so342301bkb.4 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:01:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87ppr55hun.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <20131016134503.25095.8044.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20131016134617.25095.10581.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <87ppr55hun.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:01:52 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20131016_180156_835663_765B3CAF) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] ath10k: fix device initialization routine From: Michal Kazior To: Kalle Valo Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 16 October 2013 08:57, Kalle Valo wrote: > Michal Kazior writes: > >>> + /* disable pending irqs */ >>> + ath10k_pci_core_write32(ar, PCIE_INTR_ENABLE_ADDRESS, 0); >>> + ath10k_pci_core_write32(ar, PCIE_INTR_CLR_ADDRESS, ~0); >> >> These use SOC_CORE_BASE_ADDRESS as the suffix, not the RTC_SOC_BASE_ADDRESS. > > But I am using SOC_CORE_BASE_ADDRESS, right? Ah, right. Sorry. My eyesight failed me :) Those function names seem a little confusing (_core_ for SOC_CORE and _soc_ for RTC_SOC) MichaƂ